Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Ms. Fry, I'm trying to understand a couple of things that you've said to this committee. You seem to be suggesting that in a number of cases in the Criminal Code, for example, where it says “or otherwise” and in section 264 where it talks about “repeatedly communicating with, either directly or indirectly”.... Do you have evidence that you can present to this committee that a crime has not been prosecuted or police haven't investigated because it says “or otherwise”, or in this way, communicating directly or indirectly?
In essence, why do you think we need this clarification? Is there a single case you know of where police said the Criminal Code is unclear, that the person is doing this bullying, but they're not investigating because it doesn't say “computer” in that section?