One minute? Oh my God.
I'll address the last part of your question. Censorship doesn't really work, and I'll tell you why. I'll give you an example. In Australia the ministry put in about $59 million to do just what you're suggesting. A 14-year-old challenged the minister that he could hack through any of those filters, and did so in front of media and did so again. If kids want to access the technologies nowadays, especially with the range of digital media that exist, they will access it.
In terms of a power imbalance, yes, there is a power imbalance, but it can also be reversed, because perpetrators are victims and victims are perpetrators.
In terms of a definition, I think we need legal definitions. I think we need more legal definitions because there are different legal aspects to cyberbullying. The difficulty with just defining the behaviour has been established already. It's very difficult to provide one common definition of the behaviour.
What was the other thing?