Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Welcome, Dr. Fry.
My first question relates to your motivation behind the bill. I haven't been around here very long, but the private members' legislation that's been introduced in my time generally is motivated by a desire to make some sort of a public statement or to create public awareness, or by a desire to plug a loophole. If that's your motivation, would you anticipate more prosecutions or convictions as a result of this bill?
The third category would be a response to a specific incident. I suppose in this case it could be the Amanda Todd case.
Could you expand a bit on your motivation and whether it falls under one of those categories, or is the grand goal actually something else?