That's part of my legal education.
In terms of applying section 184.4 to section 183, I understand that you want to make it consistent with the way the other sections, 186 and 188, function, but here, if you read the Supreme Court judgment in Tse, it says:
The list of offences in s. 183 is itself very broad; however, Parliament chose to focus upon an unlawful act that would cause serious harm. We see no reason to interfere with that choice.
I don't understand why we have to make it consistent with sections 186 and 188 when the purpose of section 184, it seems to me, as a layperson, is different from that of sections 186 and 188.