We're in agreement with that. The more data that citizens and Parliament have the better when evaluating extraordinary provisions such as this, especially if you turn your attention to the previous reports prepared under that section and look at the difficulty and the work required to parse the information in that data and have it in a manageable and useful form for the citizens and Parliament. More information is welcome, and the clarity of that report, although it's not constitutionally mandated by the Supreme Court, is of course always of interest when evaluating extraordinary provisions such as this one.
