It answers the question.
I want to reiterate, in case it's not clear, that we know it's an issue. We think it is important to actually tackle gangs, and it is a tool that moves us in the right direction. Obviously, we mentioned prevention. You chose to use this line, and I agree it's a private member's bill; you're entitled to do that. Maybe you could tell us why the government's not doing enough on that side, but I'm not sure you'll do that.
Coming back to some of the things we raised with respect to mandatory minimum sentences, in terms of the charter, because obviously, we're going towards taking away a certain right that is protected by the charter, I was wondering if—and I think Mr. Jacob has asked this—you have looked at that aspect of it. Has anyone, for instance, any expert or someone you would have met or a stakeholder, said that they have looked at it from the charter's perspective? We know that normally when it comes from the government, there is an obligation to look at it on that front, although we're not sure it's always being met. In your case, could you tell us if you looked at that aspect of it and who you consulted?