Assuming it does go through, I think the recommendations of my colleague here are all very pertinent. Clearly he's very concerned about doing the sport in the safest way possible. I think what he's recommended in terms of the pre-, during, and post-assessment would be very important. I think those are all good protections.
We continue, as I've stated many times here now, to be very uncomfortable with the sport, for the reasons I've already stated. But if it were to pass, certainly the CMA is in favour of harm reduction models. In fact, we've been involved in harm reduction for many other things—with respect to addictions and mental health issues, for example—so certainly, if it were to pass, the harm reduction model is one that we would support. However, we don't feel that it should be the first line of defence.