There is a difference. Human trafficking has provided new tools. The main distinction, with respect to procuring, is that we must provide absolute proof for prostitution, but not in the case of human trafficking. With respect to human trafficking, we need to prove exploitation. The important aspect in human trafficking is the exploitation of an individual. With respect to procuring, there is a type of exploitation, but we need to prove that prostitution has occurred. So this removes the burden of proof to a certain extent. We have to be able to prove that the person has been exploited, regardless of the type of work or service provided. That is the first distinction.
The second thing is that there is a distinction made in the level of seriousness. With respect to procuring, there does not have to be evidence of threats or coercion. The individual who lives from the proceeds of prostitution may be charged. With respect to human trafficking, there is a graduated scale, there is coercion, threats, and safety issues for the victim, making it possible to separate two types of individuals. One does not prevent the other and the two clauses are complementary. The benefits provided by the two of them together can be used.