If I may clarify, sir, I want to quibble with the term “significant errors”. There was one primary error that related to the coding of previous NCR cases. When we looked at research on recidivism, or the number of individuals found NCR, or the nature of the offences that led to the NCR, all that data remained the same.
We became aware of the error on March 14 and communicated that to the minister's office that day. The amended report was then provided to the research division on March 18 with an acknowledgement seeking clarification of the nature of the coding error. So the office was aware of that in March.