On a related matter, the bill removes the requirement that the conditions imposed on the NCR accused be “the least onerous and least restrictive” possible, while elevating, if you will, the requirement to protect the public, which we all agree needs to be in there, and you've made reference to it.
The language I quoted was drawn directly from the ruling by the Supreme Court. Can you speak to the consequences, both practically and constitutionally, of deleting this particular criteria?