As our first point, to a certain extent, we feel that it would be preferable for this bill to have been set in a broader context of support, and to have as a strategy the protection of and support for people who are victims of crime and, specifically, a broader strategy of fighting mental illness and its effects on society.
My second point essentially deals with some food for thought, with a criticism. The key point in this bill is the definition of “high-risk accused”. The minister wants to make a distinction here. We have to decide whether, in so doing, he has used the right language and the right concept.