Mr. Chairman, I wasn't sure if the decision is to come back to this, but it may assist the committee in deciding the way forward. We obviously would need some time to look at these details as well but it might help the committee to understand that, for example, the ombudsman's submission says that victims should be advised of the location of the forensic facility where the accused is detained. This information is available right now in the disposition decision that is made publicly available. It's the type of thing that you wouldn't necessarily want to see in the Criminal Code or without thinking it through more thoroughly.
We're looking at this at the same time—we just got it at the break—about providing advanced notice to the victim when there might be an escorted absence into the community. In my understanding those are the types of decisions that are made at the clinical level, at the hospital that's managing the care and treatment of the NCR-accused. Those are decisions that might be made with very little notice. It might be because an opportunity presents itself. It might have broader implications than we've had an opportunity to consider. But if it assists the committee, I'd offer that at this time.