Thank you very much to everyone here for your understanding.
Again, I appreciate that we need to have all the information before, that we need to have some of the amendments before we can have something looked at and not have something on the fly as I just moved.
I'd like to remind you that we had our deadline for the amendments before we heard all the witnesses. That was because of a motion that was brought forward by the Conservatives with respect to forcing the opposition, or us, to bring forward all the amendments even before we heard witnesses, even today. Does that mean that witnesses who come after the deadline are not as important?
I know you're not saying that, but I'm saying that if we want to have amendments, we should listen to all the witnesses before we can put forward amendments. In this case, according to the motion, we had to put forward amendments before we heard all the witnesses. That's why we're working on the fly. I appreciate that it is not the way we should do it.
Honestly, the idea here, when we reacted to what the witnesses said, is we need to have more information for victims. That was very clear. All the victims have said that. The victims' associations have said they need more information to protect victims. This is why in reaction to that we have come up with the amendments.
I appreciate that it is on the fly because of the motion the Conservatives put forward, which is not allowing us to look at all the testimony before we can make amendments.