We're not able to support the amendment. The first part of the amendment seeks to clarify that a high-risk accused finding does not create a presumption of dangerousness. While it is true that the existing law in the bill does not create any presumption of dangerousness, the bill does not create a court hearing process to lead to a judicial finding to confirm whether a particular accused is dangerous.
The second part of the amendment is unnecessary. The bill puts the burden on the prosecution to make the application and satisfy the court that the accused meets the test for the finding of high risk.