I think my answer to the question is this. If it's recognized that a mental health or health issue is connected to the offence, then obviously that should be taken into consideration by the court. Our proposal says, just as with drug treatment, that the judge can delay sentencing if there is a treatment program that the person successfully completes, because that contributes to safer streets. And if there is treatment needed, that's addressed.
What we're doing is looking at the bigger picture. In other words, if it is clearly established that there's a mental health issue present—not just because somebody suggests it, but because it's there—then I think we would all agree that we want that addressed, because if that's not addressed—