I don't have my copy of the Criminal Code, so I'll assume what you said is correct.
My concern comes from this: that we are taking reasonable grounds to suspect, which is likely a fine threshold when you're dealing with routing information, basic bank account information, and we're now applying it to what's called transmission data, which goes beyond usual telephone systems and routing systems and things like that. So it is in fact exposing more information, more information about what the individual is doing. It's not just in terms of quantity, because I create more Internet signalling data in a day than I do telephone data that tells you more; it actually goes not specifically to the content of the communications but it's much more illustrative of the individual and therefore potentially more intrusive.
I think that if you're going to go up that intrusiveness scale, you need to go up the standard scale, or you need to reduce the intrusiveness and keep that threshold. To be absolutely clear, the transmission data only includes originating IP address, maybe ending IP address, the time of the transmission, and that's that. There's nothing related to protocol information, nothing related to the nature of the communication—not content, but the nature—and nothing related to that sort of stuff.