Your approach is very balanced. I see that you're not against the police powers and the preservation of information as long as the level of intrusion is matched by some amount of supervision. I think that's well reasoned.
I was curious about your comments on, say, an image being given to a third party, and they have no way of knowing.... You said that the standard was reckless, that it was too low. What's your suggestion on what these standards should be?