Thank you, Mr. Chair. I'll be sharing my time with my colleague Mr. Garrison.
My question is for Mr. Oliver. One of the witnesses expressed doubt about the main section of the bill, saying that there's a challenge with it. I'm going to read out what he said, because he expressed it perfectly. He said that the real challenge arises when addressing third parties who do not know the person depicted in the image, nor do they know the circumstances under which the image was taken.
So the provisions in the bill include a recklessness standard, which is too low. How would you manage that? Do you think there should be a revisit of that proposed section, like raising the standard, because third parties could be caught in a situation where they didn't know. The proposed section states that “being reckless as to whether or not”. Is the recklessness standard too low?
Mr. Chu, do you have a comment?.