So you think that there's a situation where it would be okay to let the evidence be destroyed. I'm trying to understand this in layman's terms. Help me out. I'm not a criminal lawyer here. I can't imagine why you would want to allow somebody to destroy evidence of a crime if it would help to prosecute and bring the person responsible for that crime to justice. I don't understand.
On May 27th, 2014. See this statement in context.