There is almost a difference between policing and prosecution, when you get down to thinking about it. We have some very technical arguments here about how to ensure the legislation complies so that we can end up with charter-proof prosecutions of criminals.
I'm, firstly, worried about keeping our children and citizens alive, when it comes to the issues of cyberbullying. So I want to ensure that the police have the tools to intervene and do whatever they can to stop the crime. If it turns out that our laws have gone too far in accordance with what the charter sets out, I'm more than happy to have a perpetrator walk but to have a child alive. I know that's a somewhat trite thing to say, but as victims, we want to see laws that protect society. We, as victims, don't want to see rights trampled, but the tie has to go to the victim here. Unless the statute is egregious in its trampling of privacy rights, my hope is that we're going to err on the side of giving the police the appropriate tools to intervene.