Great. Thank you.
Mr. Turk, I want to talk to you about your concern with respect to the standard of reasonable grounds to suspect versus reasonable grounds to believe with respect to transmission data. We keep hearing that this is about metadata, and I'm going to respectfully disagree. I think transmission data is a narrower category of metadata. You get less information than you would with metadata, with transmission data.
You're saying that this is lowering the standard. In other circumstances, it's the reasonable grounds to believe. But if you want to get a telephone recorder, which will give you the information of where a phone call originated from, who the phone call went to, and how long the phone call took place, that's subsection 492.2(1) of the Criminal Code, and to get that, it is reasonable grounds to suspect.
So it's not lowering the standard. In fact it's the same standard. People are saying, as you are saying, that the big problem is that on an email you can find out that they emailed a doctor, and therefore you're getting personal information, and that should be at a higher standard. Well, you get that from a phone call too. All you have to do is look up on Canada 411 what that phone number was.
So actually the standard isn't changing. It's the exact same.