I think we're going to go back and forth and disagree on that.
I don't think that a police officer is going to go on a fishing expedition to the extent of going through their chain of command to convince their superior that they need to take their limited resources to go to court and take the time to convince a judge just to randomly obtain the data of Canadian citizens because they feel like it. That seems to be what's being suggested by people who oppose this section. And for the life of me I can't understand why busy police officers are going to go on those kinds of expeditions.