You don't have those figures. I'll lay it out. I have problems with the exaggeration by government and by members of your party on how they perceive these bills are going to do so much for public safety. That's why I asked the question and asked about the numbers. We don't know.
Yes, there are thousands of people. Mr. Dechert's case and your case involving the two incidents are terrible cases; there's no question about it. We want to prevent re-victimization and reassure people that they will not be re-victimized and that families are not living in fear, but to say this bill is going to have an impact on the public safety of thousands of people when there may be only ten I think is exaggerating.
We agree with the intent of it. I just want to make that point. In terms of court decisions at the moment, these restrictions can already be imposed by a judge. Is that correct?