All right.
We previously heard from Mr. David Butt. He represented the Kids' Internet Safety Alliance. He's a former prosecutor and has argued many cases before the Supreme Court of Canada.
He said a number of things about the bill. He said that we should all ask precisely what pre-existing privacy rights bill C-13 takes away, and the answer is, precisely none.
He went on to say that the bill does not expand police powers to obtain information without a prior court order. So any suggestion that Bill C-13 authorizes more invasive warrantless cyber-snooping is an urban myth.
Specifically on the point of section 25, he asked whether the police can ask ISPs to provide voluntarily information about the Internet profile. Again, the answer is very little—just a subscriber’s name and address. That is all.
It was his view that this bill, and the provision we're talking about, simply codify section 25 and the case law. Do you agree or disagree with that?