I actually have not seen the exact language of the motion, but absolutely, as we said in our submission filed before the committee yesterday, we are of the view that if Parliament decides not to divide the bill, which would be ideal from our perspective, the next best thing would be to adopt a clause that would require a parliamentary review of the new statute after a period of time. We suggest five years. I don't know what your motion calls for.
Certainly, when legislation was amended in other countries, in Europe, for instance, government authorities found, after similar legislation was adopted, that there were amendments to be made after the fact, that certain lessons had been learned, and that it would be useful to have a clause requiring a parliamentary review after a certain period, so that these lessons are learned and are the subject of parliamentary debate and possibly amendments after a certain number of years.