With all due respect, I would retort to the parliamentary secretary that clause 3 that follows ensures that people can always return to the court to change the conditions. The legislation does not take away a judge's discretionary power, but the judge can order an individual not to use the Internet for a maximum period of five years. If other requirements are involved, that individual could always come back before the court.
That's probably more prudent. The presumption of innocence is a fundamental principle the government sometimes forgets, but this clarification will guarantee that, across Canada—which is a large country—justice will be served in the same way, regardless of the location. While providing the court with broad discretion and the possibility to make an individual appear again in order to change the conditions imposed on them, this meets all the criteria set by the government and establishes a safeguard. That approach is more consistent with the state of the law in Canada.