I'm utterly shocked because honestly I think this is, again with all due respect, a lame excuse. The minister was very clear. I took the time to ask the minister and when the minister tells you that he has no problem with the concept of amending to make sure that it complies with what has already been adopted by Parliament, to now put it back to the fact that it's in front of the Senate.... I'm really shocked. I mean, why not do right now what we already all agreed to do? So it's just making sure that we won't have to come back later to just make sure that the two laws
are saying the same thing. Seriously, either the minister said something false when he appeared or something else...
I am being told that we have not heard from witnesses concerning this, but I think the best witness is the Minister of Justice, and he accepts the amendment. If that is not enough for the government members, I would have a few words for the Minister of Justice regarding his credibility with his colleagues.