If we split the difference at “five”, we've got a deal.
I think seven years is too long, especially when the environment is so rapidly changing. Three years may well have been aggressive, but we have seen the number five in other pieces of legislation.
I'd be much more comfortable with five years, but I can say that I'm encouraged that there's even some interest from the government on this. I'm quite prepared to agree to something longer than three years. I do think seven years is too long in this environment.