Then you don't agree. Thank you.
Sorry, I don't have a lot of time and I would like to talk to Mr. Swan about the $20 million. I think it's very important that instead of implementing a bill that would target the consequences of a situation, why not try to target the problematic at its source? Why not say that social factors unfortunately make some people more vulnerable than others, so why not try to implement something, such as financial programs or whatever, to target the problematic at its source? We're talking about reducing poverty.
If we're talking about achieving equality between men and women, then why not target poverty? We know that unfortunately, women usually live in a greater state of poverty than do men. Can you elaborate on that?