As for the communication provision that relates to selling a sexual service, as it is phrased in the bill, I would argue that it is unconstitutional because it targets those who are victims of, first of all, a human rights violation but also a crime.
I think it would specifically be unconstitutional in terms of section 15 on a gender equality basis—so the equality based on sex—but also under other provisions, which I think the courts outlined to some extent in the decision.