I tend to agree.
Also, on a point of principle,
It wasn't even in the initial bill. We just finished hearing from the witnesses. No one asked that question before the end. It would bother me a little to focus straight away on this issue without any details other than just Mr. Hoover's answer. His answer gives us the overall consequences of this sub-amendment, if there is a sub-amendment. It's a matter of principle. We already have to come up with amendments that are still within the scope of the bill, and if we also have to start cleaning up the entire Criminal Code as we do our study, we will never finish. For that matter, we too would have a lot of ideas about that.
I'll limit myself to what's before us. Otherwise, we might have to think about these issues even more before we open that door.