I see it as being a bit like the victim saying, “Hello, we're here.” We talked with group of victims who said that sometimes everything happens and it's done, and they're left saying, “What the hell happened here?”
So it's as if it's saying, with this bill, “If you don't want to impose it, at least you have to tell me, the victim, why you are not doing so.”
I wanted to see if you were okay with the suggestion from Mr. Spratt concerning the oral at trial. We know that a lot of the decisions are rendered orally by the court. They don't take the time to write because they have so many cases.
What is your position on that?