One of the constitutional aspects that troubles me that you didn't speak to or I don't think you spoke to, and I would invite you to do so, is that there's a reverse-onus provision in the material benefits section, which I would argue violates the presumption of innocence. I can refer you to the section, but I expect you have it. Do you have any opinion, any comment to offer with respect to a potential charter challenge in this respect?
On July 9th, 2014. See this statement in context.