It did explain that, you know, we have to—
I will say it in French, as that will be easier for me.
We have to distinguish between the person who is exploiting and the person who is protecting. That's my understanding of the Bedford case. That's what the court stated. So there must be cases where people can be protected.
Is there no way to clarify section 212 of the Criminal Code concerning pimps? That would have helped the court formulate a better response.