I gather that the government is okay with the fact that we're talking about “next to any other place where persons under the age of 18 can reasonably be expected to be present”. We all heard that the bill was lacking in clarity in this regard. I understood that it was mostly because we made.... Well, it's pretty much on par with what is already covered in the Criminal Code: $1000.
What I'm understanding from the government side is that it's bad but that it could be worse. That's basically the argument.
Okay, thank you.