Yes.
As it exists right now in the CCRA, there are two categories of information. There is what we call the mandatory class of information that must be disclosed to the victim, and that is generally already public information, information that would have already been available through the trial process, for instance, the name of the offender and the location of the penitentiary where they're serving their sentence.
The second category is what we refer to as the discretionary category of information that may be disclosed to the victim. That's a bit of a longer list of information that may be disclosed at the discretion of the commissioner or the chairperson of the parole board. It's that second category of information that is subject to a privacy test to ensure that releasing that information is on a case-by-case basis, and that it is always appropriate to do so in the instant case.
I would certainly say that this bill would certainly strengthen those measures in ensuring that the onus would always veer toward disclosure, although requests for information are always going to be treated on a case-by-case basis.