In this context, do you think this will confirm the rulings handed down by the courts to extend these periods of time? Won't they rather use this as support?
From what you're saying, the unique situation of the parties constitutes precisely the argument used by the judges to determine the amount payable over, I don't know, a period of 100 months. In one particular case, this period was quite long.
Moreover, in my view, the decision was very thorough and carefully explained, under the circumstances, and included the factors you just mentioned. This is why, to my way of thinking, the government took note, if you will, of the problems that started emerging in the courts.