Okay.
I have two follow-ups to that.
The first is with respect to clause 20 of the proposed victims bill of rights on page 6, where it talks about the following:
This Act is to be construed and applied in a manner that is reasonable in the circumstances....
Then it goes on with a bunch of criteria.
You've said that if it's to be interpreted this way, it's unconstitutional. Can it be saved by clause 20? How is it to be interpreted? Where clause 20 says that the interpretation that we have to give of it is constitutional, what would that interpretation be? And how would you recommend it be clarified so that everybody knows that's what was meant, and that it is to be constitutional?