I'll go to your second question first.
In terms of the victims bill of rights, I want to focus more so on Inuit with regard to the Gladue decision. The Gladue decision requires a CSO. For aboriginals in Canada, most of them do have the resources available. Inuit, in terms of the regions, do not have those basic, basic resources that every Canadian should have. As a victim, you do not have those resources. So speaking specifically to Inuit in terms of the Gladue decision, how is a CSO supposed to be brought forward when Inuit don't even have those basic resources? How are the courts, the judges, supposed to implement that CSO?
So the courts are feeling powerless, really. The judges don't really know what to do. They're supposed to give these decisions without...and then they're seeing the offenders come back into their courts very often.