From the perspective of the RCMP anyway there is a mechanism in place so that if a person is a victim of crime and then doesn't believe the police have done their job in a proper manner, they can lay a complaint through an appropriate agency to have that dealt with. It does exist from the perspective of an investigation on the police.
Further to that, you had mentioned in your statement, protection from intimidation and having the police be able to deal with that. Again, please give me an example because the way I dealt with things in my tenure was if I arrested X for assaulting Y that person was released either on a recognizance and/or an appearance notice—probably not an appearance notice, promise to appear or recognizance—or in some cases before the judge who would put conditions on that person whether it be a no contact, whether it be a lot of those things.
If the conditions are in place, is your suggestion that the police, if they know those conditions, would need to act on those conditions regardless of whether the victim says anything or not? Under most circumstances the police would never know until the victim comes forward and says there's been a breach. Then the police under normal circumstances will act on that breach, but most of the time they don't know about the breach.