I'd have to say no, because a justice or a judge can still order that the identity of somebody—including name and everything—be hidden from anybody in the courtroom and still consider all parts of clause 17 and the other part in clause 20 and still say, “Yes, we can still do it”. I don't see how they can work in conjunction. It's still there. It's part of the problem.
On November 6th, 2014. See this statement in context.