By all means, absolutely.
I'll give you an example. When we went through the section 745 hearing a number of years ago—and it's a little bit different in relation to a victim impact statement—I took Daryn's picture with me. It was an eight by ten; it was in a frame; it was in the court. Now, at that particular time, we were very well supported by the crown counsel who was going to look after us going through the court system. We wanted to read our victim impact statements. It had not yet been legislated, although courts throughout the country were already allowing victims to read their victim impact statement.
We weren't allowed to because the crown counsel took his time and told us why he didn't think we should. He said the offender would be able to cross-examine us—Clifford Olson was representing himself—and he thought that would be very, very harmful for us. So we took his advice. During that whole time, I had Daryn's picture and it was close to my heart, because he was at the hearing with me. Although he was not there in body, he was very much there in spirit. When you're going to do a victim impact statement, I totally agree with that. However, if you're going to bring all kinds of paraphernalia, you have to remember that a court is a court. It's not a memorial, and you shouldn't bring in a huge picture. I think there has to be some discretion there.