Maybe Ms. May will be able to remove any worries I have with that pretty vast phrase.
My concern is that we say “infringe upon the right to privacy of any person”. Obviously, this also concerns the words “any person”.
The phrase “of any person” will also concern the person who would have been found guilty of something. Does that cover photos, pictures? That was something the victims said, that sometimes to know what the person looked like.... I'm just a bit afraid that the right to privacy is a very vast topic and it might create some.... I don't know; I just find it's a bit, maybe, too broad as an expression. I don't know how I could circumvent it.
I understand that we do not want to give rise to unreasonable infringement. It may involve an infringement of privacy under the bill, but be considered reasonable in the context of a free and democratic society. Here, however, it seems really quite broad and vast.
I do not think that anyone would object to someone knowing what a person looks like upon being released from prison, 15 years later, if only so that they are not shocked when they find themselves face-to-face with the person.