This is for the witnesses from the Department of Justice.
Could you please explain the logic behind this amendment and what it actually means? “Provide” and “remove” are completely contradictory concepts.
Basically, the government amendment seeks to indicate that if there are situations in which a person can play the role of the party or of the observer, that would be fine, as well. In fact, this doesn't mean a thing. I am trying to understand how something can be provided and taken away at the same time. Could you explain it to us from a legal perspective?