I would like to come back to Mr. Goguen's question specifically.
I think Ms. May's amendment fits in nicely with what you just said. There is no harm in specifying in the proceedings against the accused that the judge or justice may, on application of the prosecutor in respect of a witness, make an order.
I cannot see any other reasons in this context, unless you tell me that there are considerations for the safety of the individual or their family for instance, or that the case law you are referring to listed other cases. That is the only reason why Mr. Casey's amendment seemed too broad perhaps.
I can understand because I know there is case law and there have been very specific and limited cases, but I don't think we want to open Pandora's box. We simply want to put on paper what you so well determined when you appeared before us the first time. That has been done before, but not on a large scale. It is good to have it written, because that will help the courts avoid an issue of common law power. They will actually be able to use a specific piece of legislation to make an analysis in a certain light.
I think it makes sense to clarify it further, as proposed in amendment PV-12.