I find the proposed amendment to be restrictive. It says that the court “shall consider” making a restitution. The wording could not be any weaker. The court's decision could even be based on factors other than the offender's reintegration into society. In fact, many other factors could be considered by the court. At least that is how I see it. The court will decide. There is no obligation. Since the provision says “shall consider”, that is what the court will do. But it could also consider a series of other factors besides social reintegration.
Ms. May, I am worried that your amendment will put all the focus on a single consideration. That could give rise to problems I am sure you would not want to happen.