If the court is able to retain some discretion over the timing of the payments, that could very well put the victim in a position whereby they would be able to enforce a civil order, because that right is suspended as long as there is a restitution order. The mandatory language indicates that a restitution order would have to be put in effect, and that could conceivably, in some circumstances, result in the victim's rights being delayed by the very presence of an order where the judge has no choice but to impose it.
On November 25th, 2014. See this statement in context.