Clause 15 was amended because G-2 carried.
(Clause 15 as amended agreed to)
(On clause 16)
Due to G-2 passing, G-4 is no longer needed, except for a small change. G-4 says “replacing lines 38 and 40”. It should be “replacing lines 38 to 40”. It's not those two lines, 38 and 40; it's lines 38 to 40. Is that okay with everybody? Consequentially, let's vote on that.
(Amendment agreed to)
(Clause 16 as amended agreed to)
(On clause 17)
There's a little bit of verbiage I need to read here.
The next amendment we're going to deal with is LIB-7. The vote on LIB-7 applies to LIB-8, LIB-9, and LIB-10, as they're all consequential. I'm assuming if LIB-7 passes, we don't need to deal with them. They would be adopted automatically. If LIB-7 is adopted, PV-12 and PV-13 cannot be moved because they amend the same lines. As I mentioned before, you can't amend lines more than once. If LIB-7 is adopted, PV-14 cannot be moved and the section amended by PV-14 would no longer exist.
There we go. That's the information for everybody.
On amendment LIB-7, Mr. Casey, the floor is yours.