In any event, we will see in due time the impact this will have on Canadians if this is not accessible. The courts will have to explain what the words “otherwise accessible” mean. If it was almost impossible to be informed or if someone was not aware, it would not have a negative impact on citizens. We understand that.
Section 18.7 still bothers me a little because it validates actions taken. In your introduction, you said:
It “does not expand” what is already used.
Perfect. This is still happening. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the section validates the past, just in case.