I want to talk about the interaction of consecutive sentences and the totality principle. I don't know who should answer the question.
When you look at the totality principle with some increased mandatory minimum penalties, and also the consecutive nature of sentencing, how do you see those things interacting with each other with some of the jurisprudence you've looked at? If there are three victims and, I don't know, four years would be the sentence for one, and now you have three that are going to be served consecutively, would that turn that into 12? Is that going to run up against the totality principle, or will judges be looking at making three that are each worth one and a half, and therefore end up right where you were before anyway?
How do you see that based on the cases and other things?